Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 16:181-184 (1976)
© 1976 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baughn, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baughn, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, C. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baughn, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, C. B.

Leaf Water Potential: Comparison of Pressure Chamber and in situ Hygrometer on Five Herbaceous Species1

J. W. Baughn and C. B. Tanner2

Leaf water potential was measured on the same leaf with an in situ dewpoint hygrometer of the Neumann-Thurtell design and with a pressure chamber, for potato (Solarium tuberosum ‘Russet Burbank’), sunflower (Helianthus annuus ‘Russian Mammoth’), pepper (Capsicum annuum ‘California Wonder’), soybean (Glycine max ‘Wells’), and oat (Avena sativa ‘Lodi’). On the average the pressure chamber measurement was within 1.5 bars of the in situ potential, although the scatter in the data was large. The comparisons showed a trend in which the pressure chamber gave lower (drier) leaf water potentials than the hygrometer in the high (wet) potential range, and higher potentials than the hygrometer in the dry potential range. This trend was most distinct in sunflowers, soybeans, and oats. Serious error in the pressure chamber measurement can result if evaporative loss of leaf water is not prevented before and during pressurization or if leaves are stored for an extended period between excision and pressurization.

Key Words: Leaf hygrometer • Pressure chamber • Solarium tuberosumHelianthus annuusCapsicum annuumGlycine maxAvena sativa


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison. Research supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706, and by USDA Hatch funds.

2 Research assistant (presently at U.W. University-Industry Research Program) and professor of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, respectively.

Received for publication June 28, 1975.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
N. M. Holbrook, M. J. Burns, and C. B. Field
Negative Xylem Pressures in Plants: A Test of the Balancing Pressure Technique
Science, November 17, 1995; 270(5239): 1193 - 1194.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Crop Science Society of America.