|
|
||||||||
Leaf water potential was measured on the same leaf with an in situ dewpoint hygrometer of the Neumann-Thurtell design and with a pressure chamber, for potato (Solarium tuberosum Russet Burbank), sunflower (Helianthus annuus Russian Mammoth), pepper (Capsicum annuum California Wonder), soybean (Glycine max Wells), and oat (Avena sativa Lodi). On the average the pressure chamber measurement was within 1.5 bars of the in situ potential, although the scatter in the data was large. The comparisons showed a trend in which the pressure chamber gave lower (drier) leaf water potentials than the hygrometer in the high (wet) potential range, and higher potentials than the hygrometer in the dry potential range. This trend was most distinct in sunflowers, soybeans, and oats. Serious error in the pressure chamber measurement can result if evaporative loss of leaf water is not prevented before and during pressurization or if leaves are stored for an extended period between excision and pressurization.
Key Words: Leaf hygrometer Pressure chamber Solarium tuberosum Helianthus annuus Capsicum annuum Glycine max Avena sativa
2 Research assistant (presently at U.W. University-Industry Research Program) and professor of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, respectively.
Received for publication June 28, 1975.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. M. Holbrook, M. J. Burns, and C. B. Field Negative Xylem Pressures in Plants: A Test of the Balancing Pressure Technique Science, November 17, 1995; 270(5239): 1193 - 1194. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||