Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 16:55-59 (1976)
© 1976 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kertesz, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kertesz, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kertesz, Z.

Harvest Index in Spaced Populations and Grain Weight in Microplots as Indicators of Yielding Ability in Spring Wheat1

R. A. Fischer and Z. Kertesz2

A set of 40 adapted homozygous spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes were grown under similar conditions of irrigation and high fertility utilizing large plots and microplots seeded at normal densities, and spaced plants (60 x 60 cm grid). The objective was to see how well spaced plant traits, especially grain weight and harvest index, and microplot yields predicted true yielding ability as measured with the large plots. Phenotypic correlation coefficients were calculated using genotype means.

Microplot yield was highly correlated (r = 0.67 at the 1% level) with large plot yield but explained less than half of the variation between the genotypes. Much of the residual was probably related to the highly significant genotype X plot type interaction. With spaced planting, yield/plant was correlated (r = 033 at the 5% level) with crop yield. Better correlations with crop yield were obtained with plant and shoot harvest indices (r = 0.56 and 0.66, respectively, at the 1% level). No numerical components of yield measured on spaced plants gave better correlations with crop yield than yield per plant itself.

These results emphasize the major effect that the degree of interplant competition, probably primarily for Ught hi this case, has on the performance of a genotype. As the degree of competition declined going from crop plots to spaced plants, genotypes which can more fully occupy the increased space available were favored; thus, the performance of non-erect genotypes improved noticeably relative to erect ones. We conclude that harvest index measurement offers promise as a predictor of yielding ability where the seed available is limited.

Key Words: Triticum aeativum L. • Triticum turgidum L. • Competition • Phenotypic correlations • Yield components • Selection criteria


1 Contribution from wheat program of International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT).

2 Wheat physiologist (present address: CSIRO Division of Plant Industry, P.O. Box 1600, Canberra City, Australia 2601) and visiting scientist (present address: Cereal Research Institute, 6701 Szeged, P.O.B. 391, Hungary), CIMMYT, Londres 40, Mexico 6, D.F., respectively.

Received for publication February 10, 1975.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. M. Gifford, J. H. Thorne, W. D. Hitz, and R. T. Giaquinta
Crop Productivity and Photoassimilate Partitioning
Science, August 24, 1984; 225(4664): 801 - 808.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Crop Science Society of America.