Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 16:42-49 (1976)
© 1976 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Byars, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Byars, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Byars, J.

Lattice Designs for Unreplicated Yield Trials of Maize Varieties at Several Plant Densities1

P. L. Cornelius and J. Byars2

The analysis of lattice designs with varieties showing a linear response to levels of some factor confounded with replications is described and illustrated with a hypothetical example. The theory is applied to a 7x7 quadruple lattice maize (Zea mays L.) variety trial with replications of the lattice planted at different plant densities. A linear regression model is used which assumes that the yield of each variety expressed as log (yield/plant) responds linearly to plant density. In a manner analogous to ordinary lattice designs, corrections for block differences to be applied Jo variety means and regression coefficients are obtained. Two methods of adjusting for variable stands, viz., covariance analysis with deviation from average stand at) a given plant density level as the covariable (Method I) and adjustment of the raw data using preliminary estimates of the variety regression coefficients (Method II), are suggested and compared with a generalized least squares solution (Method III). Method III is the theoretically correct procedure but we consider it impractical for large experiments. Both Methods I and II gave good approximations to the results for Metlfod III.

The experiment showed significant differences among variety means and among variety regression coefficients. Information on varietal response to plant density is obtained at the cost of very little loss of precision on variety means. It is suggested that for equivalent varietal replication more comprehensive yield trial data could be obtained by evaluation at more plant density levels with less (or possibly no) replication ot each density.

Key Words: Zea mays L. • Experimental design • Split plots • Corn plant population • Crop variety testing


1 Journal Article No. 75-3-50 of Kentucky Agric. Exp. Stn. published with the approval of the director.

2 Assistant professor of agronomy and statistics and research analyst, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, respectively.

Received for publication April 23, 1975.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Crop Science Society of America.