Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 16:39-42 (1976)
© 1976 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Andrew, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, J. R., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Andrew, R. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Andrew, R. H.

Parameters for Determination of Damage to Sweet Corn Genotypes from First and Second Generation European Corn Borer1

J. R. Carlson, Jr. and R. H. Andrew2

This research was designed 1) to determine infestation techniques and parameters best suited for assessment of relative resistance to European corn borer, (Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.) among adapted sweet corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids, and 2) to study the interrelationships of first and second generation damage, host maturity, and environment. Four egg masses placed in the whorl and on the ear shoot were used to simulate egg laying by first and second generation corn borer adults, respectively, at Arlington, Wis. in 2 years. Husk ratings and ear tunnel counts were used to measure both first and second generation damage. Tip ratings and ear indexes were used to further evaluate second generation damage. Simple phenotypic correlations were obtained among damage parameters and maturity and Spearman's rank correlations were used to investigate the consistency of the data across years.

Differences following first generation infestation in the whorl stage of development usually were not significant or consistent. Use of husk damage ratings, ear tunnel counts, and ear damage indexes following second generation infestation of ear shoots gave significant and consistent measures of hybrid differences in two markedly different seasons. First and second generation measurements of damage were not significantly related. For the hybrids included in these trials, maturity was negatively and consistently correlated with all second generation damage parameters.

Key Words: Zea mays L. • Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner) • Maturity • Insect resistance


1 Contribution from the Dep. of.Agronomy, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. Research supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Umversity of Wisconsin-Madison; the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, and the Wisconsin Canners and Freezers Association. The authors acknowledge entomological advice from J. W. Apple and corn borer pupae supplied by the USDA Corn Borer Research Unit in Ankeny, Iowa.

2 Graduate research assistant, now at Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59715, and professor of agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

Received for publication April 25, 1975.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Crop Science Society of America.