Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 15:763-766 (1975)
© 1975 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. L.

Breeding Potentials of Noncultivated Cottons. I. Some Agronomic and Fiber Properties of Selected Parents and Their F1 Hybrids1

F. D. Wilson and R. L. Wilson2

Using a complete diallel set, we analyzed 12 agronomic and fiber characters in five cottons (Gossypium hirsutum L.), and their F1 hybrids. Two of these were adapted cultivars, and the remainder were Texas race stocks. The cultivars were early and productive at Phoenix, whereas the three race stocks varied widely in earliness, lint characteristics, fruit size, growth habit, and other agronomic characters under consideration. Narrow sense heritability estimates for the 12 characters ranged from 0.04 for date of first flower to 1.29 for 2.5% fiber span length. Estimates of general combining ability were significant for number of bolls/plot, peduncle length, and five fiber traits. Thus, selection for these characters should be effective.

Nonadditive variance was significant for nine of the 12 characters measured, and comprised the majority of the genetic variance for three of these nine characters. There were no significant maternal effects. Reciprocal effects were significant for a few character/hybrid combinations. Fifteen of the possible 120 character/hybrid combinations showed specific heterosis. Eleven were positive, three negative, and one that may be neutral in the sense of agronomic fitness. Mean heterosis (F1 vs. midparent) was significant only for date of first flower.

Key Words: Gossypium hirsutum L. • Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) • Pink bollworm • Host-plant resistance • Additive variance • Nonadditive variance • Heterosis • Maternal effects • Reciprocal effects • Heritability


1 Contribution from ARS-USDA, Phoenix, Ariz., in cooperation with the Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn. Thanks are extended to C. W. Fitzgibbons, for maintaining field plots and R. O. Kuehl, for statistical advice (both of the Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn.), to C. V. Feaster and Clara Belknap, USDA, ARS, Phoenix, for fiber analyses, and to J. N. Smith and R. R. Remington for field and laboratory assistance.

2 Research geneticist and research entomologist, respectively, Western Cotton Research Laboratory, ARS-USDA, 4135 E. Broadway Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85040.

Received for publication February 13, 1975.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1975 by the Crop Science Society of America.