Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 15:225-229 (1975)
© 1975 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boerma, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boerma, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Boerma, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.

Comparison of Three Selection Procedures for Yield in Soybeans1

H. R. Boerma and R. L. Cooper2

Four segregating soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] populations were used to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of three selection procedures in isolating highyielding lines; early-generation yield testing (EGT), pedigree selection (PS), and single-seed-descent selection (SSD). Lines were obtained from the PS procedure in the F4 generation and from the EGT and SSD procedures in the F5 generation. These lines were yield-tested and selected in either the F6 or F7 generation in each procedure. In the F8 generation of each cross the selected lines in each procedure were compared.

The means of all selected lines, the means of the five highest-yielding lines, and the highest-yielding line from each population showed no consistent differences in procedures. The lines from the EGT procedure were consistently later in maturity than the lines from the other two procedures. This was attributed to the yield-testing in unbordered plots in the early generations by the EGT procedure. The SSD procedure emerged as the most efficient procedure, because it required less selection effort than the EGT and PS procedures, allows a rapid advance of the early-generation segregating populations, and did not use expensive yield-testing until later generations, when yield-testing is more efficient.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Early generation yield testing • Pedigree selection • Single-seed-descent selection


1 Cooperative investigations of the ARS, USDA, and the Ill. Agr. Exp. Stn., Urbana, Ill. Publication no. 770 of the U. S. Regional Soybean Lab., Urbana, Ill.

2 Assistant professor, Dept. of Agron., U. of Ga., Athens, GA 30602; and research agronomist, U. S. Regional Soybean Lab., ARS, USDA, and professor, Dept. of Agron., U. of Ill, Urbana, IL 61801, respectively.

Received for publication February 22, 1974.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. G. Jones and C. W. Smith
Early Generation Testing in Upland Cotton
Crop Sci., December 2, 2005; 46(1): 1 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Macchiavelli and J. S. Beaver
Effect of Number of Seed Bulked and Population Size on Genetic Variability When Using the Multiple-Seed Procedure of SSD
Crop Sci., September 1, 2001; 41(5): 1513 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
L. G. Streit, W. R. Fehr, and G. A. Welke
Family and Line Selection for Seed Yield of Soybean
Crop Sci., March 1, 2001; 41(2): 358 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J.M. Hegstad, G. Bollero, and C.D. Nickell
Potential of Using Plant Row Yield Trials to Predict Soybean Yield
Crop Sci., November 1, 1999; 39(6): 1671 - 1675.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1975 by the Crop Science Society of America.