Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 15:172-174 (1975)
© 1975 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Major, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Luedders, V. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Major, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Luedders, V. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Major, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Luedders, V. D.

Evaluation of Eleven Thermal Unit Methods for Predicting Soybean Development1

D. J. Major, D. R. Johnson and V. D. Luedders2

Dates of emergence, flowering, beginning pod fill, termination of flowering, and physiological maturity were recorded for two soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars from each of the maturity groups I to V. The cultivars were planted on five dates at three Missouri locations in 1971, 1972, and 1973, and at weekly intervals at Columbia, Mo., in 1972 and 1973. Daily maximum and minimum temperatures were used to calculate five thermal unit methods with no base temperature subtracted, four methods with a base temperature subtracted, and two methods using quadratic formulas.

Thermal units with a base temperature subtracted, including the "growing degree day method" used by the corn industry , and thermal units using quadratic formulas were the best for predicting flowering. The number of thermal units was not better than calendar days for predicting post-flowering development. Prediction of flowering was more accurate for early cultivars than for late cultivars, suggesting that another factor (probably day-length) also influenced flowering and had its greatest effect on the later maturing cultivars.

Key Words: Temperature • Flowering


1 Contribution from Dept. of Agron., Mo. Agr. Exp. Stn., Columbia, MO 65201. Journal no. 6975. Submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of requirements for a Ph.D. degree.

2 Research scientist, Canada Agr. Res. Stu., Lethbridge, Alta., T1J 4B1, Canada; assistant professor, Dept. of Agron., U. of Mo.-Columbia; and agronomist, ARS, USDA, Columbia, MO 65201.

Received for publication June 17, 1974.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1975 by the Crop Science Society of America.