Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 15:1-4 (1975)
© 1975 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eberhart, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eberhart, S. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eberhart, S. A.

Hybrid Performance of Selected Maize Lines from Reciprocal Recurrent and Testcross Selection Programs1

W. A. Russell and S. A. Eberhart2

We evaluated three maize (Zea mays L.) crosses among BSCBI(R)C5, BSSS(R)C5, and BSSS(HT)C6 populations in six environments. BSCBI(R)C5 and BSSS(R)C5 improved populations from reciprocal recurrent selection, and BSSS(HT)C6 was obtained from testcross selection with a double-cross tester. Also, we used five selected S3 lines from each of BSCBI(R)C5 and BSSS(R)C5 and five selected S3 or S4 lines from BSSS(HT)C5 in three sets of line x line crosses among the sources. Average yields of the population crosses were essentially equal, which was unexpected for BSSS(R)C5 x BSSS(HT)C6 Most of the variation among crosses in each set was accounted for by average line performance (general combining ability) in all traits.

Average yield of line crosses in a set was significantly higher than the population cross in each set and in the BSCBI(R)C5 x BSSS(R)C5 and BSCBI(R)C5 x BSSS (HT)C6 sets, the best cross yielded 35% more than the population cross. Two BSCBI(R)C5 x BSSS(R)C5 crosses yielded significantly higher than B37 x Oh43, and one of these crosses was equal to B37 x Oh43 for lodging resistance. None of the crosses in the other two sets was equal to B37 x Oh45 for all traits, mainly because of lodging. A modified reciprocal recurrent selection procedure using an inbred tester is proposed as a more efficient method of simultaneously improving breeding populations and developing elite single crosses.

Key Words: Zea mays L. • Population improvement • Corn • Hybrid


1 Joint contribution from the ARS-USDA, and Journal Paper no. J-7929 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, IA 50010. Project no. 1897.

2 Professor, Iowa State University, and Research Geneticist, USDA, and Professor, Iowa State University.

Received for publication June 12, 1974.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1975 by the Crop Science Society of America.