Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 14:696-699 (1974)
© 1974 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohel, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kohel, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, C. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kohel, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, C. F.

Genetics of Flowering Response in Cotton. VI. Flowering Behavior of Gossypium hirsutum L. and G. barbadense L. Hybrids

R. J. Kohel, T. R. Richmond and C. F. Lewis2

The center-of-origin cottons (Gossypium spp.) are isolated from cultivated American cottons by their shortday flowering response, and an understandng of the inheritance of flowering response is important hi attempting to transfer genes from these primitive cottons. The genetic systems controlling flowering response in Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadense cottons were studied in diallel crosses involving short-day anl day-neutral lines of each species. The G. hirsutum lines were Texas Marker-1 and M-ll (day-neutral) and Texas 220 and Texas 371 (short-day). The G. barbadense lines were ‘Pima S-l’ and 3-79 (day-neutral) and ‘Lengupa’ (shortday). These lines were crossed in all possible combinations, and the F1, F2, backcrosses to both parents, and a testcross to Texas Marker-1 were grown for each combination. Flowering response was recorded as percentage of flowering plants and the mean date of flowering for each line in the field at College Station, Texas. A failure to meet the preanalysis tests of assumptions prevented the analysis of these data by the Hayman-Jinks diallel analysis. The data were analyzed by comparison of mean, performance. We concluded that G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, represented in this study, have nonhomologous systems controlling flowering response. Within G. barbadense, flowering response is recessive to nonflowering and under single-gene control. In G. hirsutum, however, flowering response is under multigenic control, which is partially dominant or additive to nonflowering. In interspecific cross combinations, the segregation for flowering response follows a multigenic pattern.

Key Words: Genetic nonhomology • Interspecific hybrids • Germplasm • Transference of genes


1 Contribution from the Southern Region, ARS, USD A, and Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Texas A7#x0026;M University, cooperating under Regional Research Project S-77.

2 Research Geneticist, Research Agronomist, Oklahoma-Texas Area, Southern Region, ARS, USDA, College Station, TX 77843, and Staff Scientist, National Program Staff, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705.

Received for publication March 4, 1974.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1974 by the Crop Science Society of America.