Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 14:87-90 (1974)
© 1974 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Twamley, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Twamley, B. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Twamley, B. E.

Recurrent Selection for Seedling Vigor in Birdsfoot Trefoil1

B. E. Twamley2

In 1969, a program of recurrent selection for seedling vigor in ‘Leo’ birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) was initiated. Seed for all tests was garnered from openpollination nurseries, small-seeded lines were discarded, and seedling vigor tests were conducted indoors on the remainder. In each cycle the most vigorous seedlings from the most vigorous lines were selected to be the parents of the next cycle. Three cycles were completed. In 1972, nursery material representing cycles 0, 1, 2, and 3 was established and harvested for seed.

Three types of experiments were used to evaluate progress: 1) random seed samples from each cycle were bulked within cycles to provide four treatments, including the check; 2) pedigree test—18 lines from each cycle, randomly chosen from within seed weight classes, were tested; and 3) a series of routine tests were used primarily to identify superior lines. In these routine tests only lines that were at least average in seed size were included.

In the bulk test the percentage improvement in seedling vigor for cycles 1, 2, and 3 over the cydc 0, or Leo population, was 10, 34, and 40%, respectively. For the pedigree test it was 20, 36, and 36%. For four routine tests the average improvement was 30, 47, and 52%. The average improvement in seed size was 36%. Inbreeding and a relaxation of selection pressure were considered responsible for the lack of progress in cycle 3 compared to cycle 2.

Possible uses of seedling vigor tests to provide information on breeding methods are discussed.

Key Words: Lotus corniculatus • Seed size improvement • Breeding methods


1 Contribution from the Department of Crop Science. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

2 Associate Professor, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Received for publication July 3, 1973.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. D. Casler and E. C. Brummer
Theoretical Expected Genetic Gains for Among-and-Within-Family Selection Methods in Perennial Forage Crops
Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 890 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. D. Casler and D. J. Undersander
Selection for Establishment Capacity in Reed Canarygrass
Crop Sci., April 25, 2006; 46(3): 1277 - 1285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. J. Smart, K. P. Vogel, L. E. Moser, and W. W. Stroup
Divergent Selection for Seedling Tiller Number in Big Bluestem and Switchgrass
Crop Sci., July 1, 2003; 43(4): 1427 - 1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1974 by the Crop Science Society of America.