Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 14:44-46 (1974)
© 1974 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. R.

Predictions of GCA Model Estimates of Total Leaf Area and Leaf Area Distribution from Leaf Area of Parental Inbreds

G. R. Johnson2

The relationships of GCA (general combining ability) for total leaf area per plant and leaf area at leaf positions somewhat distal to the ear leaf to parental total leaf area per plant and leaf area at individual leaf positions were investigated by means of multiple regression procedures applied to data obtained from 10 homozygous inbred lines of corn (Zea mays L.) and the diallel set of crosses among them. In the multiple regression analyses, GCA model estimates of leaf area at leaf positions —4 and 6 (the fourth leaf position below and sixth leaf position above the ear, respectively) and total leaf area were used as dependent variables, while midparent values of leaf area at individual leaf positions and total leaf area were used as independent variables. The regression equations were then appraised for their ability to predict F1 leaf area, based on a GCA effects model, from midparent leaf area values.

The results indicated: 1) GCA model estimates of total leaf area could readily have been predicted from midparent total leaf area; 2) GCA model estimates of leaf area at leaf position 6 could have been predicted by a linear function of midparent observations of total leaf area, leaf area at the upper leaf positions, and leaf area at leaf positions near the ear; and 3) GCA model estimates of leaf area at position —4 could have been predicted by a linear function of midparent values including leaf area at and below the ear leaf. However, since GCA model estimates of leaf area at leaf position —4 were poorly and mostly negatively correlated with parental leaf area, prediction of F1 leaf area at the lower leaf positions might generally be tenuous.

Key Words: Maize • Multiple regression


2 DEKALB AgResearch, Inc. Thomasboro, IL 61878.

Received for publication June 14, 1973.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1974 by the Crop Science Society of America.