Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 13:645-648 (1973)
© 1973 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. B.

Floral Induction and Development in Festuca rubra L. — Differential Clonal Response to Environmental Conditions1

J. J. Murray2, A. C. Wilton3 and J. B. Powell2

Development of suitable procedures for production of inflorescence and subsequent seed production of red fescue, Festuca rubra L., under controlled conditions would facilitate earlier completion of breeding procedures and genetic tests. Two studies were conducted in 1970–71.

The first study was to determine the date of floral induction. Propagules from 15 clones were removed from the field every 14 days beginning October 28, 1970 through January 14, 1971, and grown under cool temperature and long photoperiods for 24 days to initiate floral primordia. They were then grown under warm temperature and long photoperiods for the production of inflorescence. Variation among clones in the required length of exposure to the field environment for floral induction was 30 days. By January 1 virtually all plants were induced. Days to heading decreased and number of panicles increased with increasing exposure to the field environment.

The second study was to determine the controlled temperature and photoperiod favorable for floral development after induction in the field. Twenty-four clones brought from the field on January 24 were placed under cool temperature and either normal daylight or continuous light for 28 days. They were then grown under controlled temperature and photoperiod regimes. Heading was earlier, number of panicles increased 17%, and number of seeds increased 45%, where the initial treatment was normal daylight. Number of panicles and seeds was greatest where the final treatment was normal daylight supplemented with 1 hour of light at midnight and 21 to 24 C. Biotypes within this species differed in their environmental requirements for floral production. By manipulating environmental conditions, we produced sufficient seed of good quality for experimental use during winter months in the greenhouse.

Key Words: Induction • Seed production • Temperature • Photoperiod


1 Contribution from Turfgrass Laboratory, Plant Genetics and Germplasm Institute, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705.

2 Research Agronomist and Research Plant Geneticist, Turfgrass Laboratory, Plant Genetics and Germplasm Institute, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, respectively.

3 Research Agronomist, U.S. Regional Pasture Research Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802 (formerly with Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland).

Received for publication May 14, 1973.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1973 by the Crop Science Society of America.