Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 13:466-469 (1973)
© 1973 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Hiler, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clark, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Hiler, E. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clark, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Hiler, E. A.

Plant Measurements as Indicators of Crop Water Deficit

R. N. Clark and E. A. Hiler2

An irrigation experiment was conducted with southern peas [Vigna sinensis L. (Endl.) var. ‘Burgundy’] utilizing lysimeters in which the soil water balance could be controlled. The purpose of the experiment was to compare certain plant measurements as indicators of crop water deficit. Plant measurements made on stressed and non-stressed plants throughout the growing season were leaf-water potential, leaf-air temperature differential, and leaf-diffusion resistance.

Leaf-water potentials were measured by the pressure chamber method on well-exposed leaves. Leaf temperatures were measured by infrared radiometry and a diffusion porometer was used to measure leaf-diffusion resistance. Tensiometers were used to determine the soilwater potential and to time the irrigations.

The plant response data taken throughout a day were sensitive to water deficits during the late vegetative stage; however, the measurements were less responsive when the leaves aged, indicated by plants in the pod development stage. The change was particularly evident in the leaf-water potential measurements. All three plant measurements did indicate water deficit to some degree. Leaf-diffusion resistance was the least responsive, and leaf-water potential was the most responsive. Results relating leaf-water potential to leaf-diffusion resistance and soilwater potential are also given.

Key Words: Leaf-water potential • Leaf temperature • Leaf-diffusion • Southern peas • Vigna sinensis L. (Endl.)


1 Contribution from The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Texas 77843. Approved as Technical Article TA9127 of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Agricultural Engineer, USDA Southwestern Great Plains Research Center, Bushland, Texas, and Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.

Received for publication March 29, 1973.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. M. O'Neill, J. F. Shanahan, and J. S. Schepers
Use of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Assessments to Differentiate Corn Hybrid Response To Variable Water Conditions
Crop Sci., February 1, 2006; 46(2): 681 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1973 by the Crop Science Society of America.