Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 13:429-432 (1973)
© 1973 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Karadavid, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Karadavid, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Karadavid, B.

Effect of Time and Rate of Application of Two Growth Retardants on Growth, Flowering, and Yield of Upland Cotton1

A. Marani2, M. Zur3, A. Eshel2, H. Zimmerman2, R. Carmeli3 and B. Karadavid3

Six experiments were conducted at four locations in Israel in order to evaluate the effect of two growth retarding chemicals, CCC and CMH, on plants of Upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. When sprayed during the first week of flowering, CCC at 50 and CMH at 480 g a.i./ha retarded the increase in height of cotton plants without adversely affecting lint yield or quality. These treatments caused a small reduction in flower production, but this was not associated with a decrease in yield. In some of the experiments, the increase in plant height following treatment was reduced by as much as 50%. Application of CCC at the rate of 100 g a.i./h at the beginning of flowering significantly reduced lint yield in one experiment. Increasing the rate of CMH to 720 g a.i./ha produced no harmful effects.

When CCC or CMH were applied in the middle of the flowering period, they were less effective in reducing plant height. These results indicate that both CCC and CMH may be used to arrest excessive vegetative development of cotton plants, and that the optimum time of application is the beginning of flowering.

Key Words: CCC • CMH • Gossypium hlrsutum


1 Contribution from the Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, and the Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel. Paper No. 2261-E of the Agricultural Research Organization.

2 Associate Professor and former students, Department of Field and Vegetable Crops, Faculty of Agriculture.

3 Research Agronomists, Division of Industrial Crops, Volcani Center.

Received for publication January 11, 1973.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1973 by the Crop Science Society of America.