Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 13:354-356 (1973)
© 1973 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, R. R.

The Relationship Between F2 and Selected F3 Progenies in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)1

William R. Meredith, Jr. and R. R. Bridge2

Yield, components of yield, and fiber determinations of five parental lines of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and their 10 F2 hybrids were made at Stoneville, Mississippi in 1968. These results were then related to the 1969 F3 performance at the same location of eight random, eight high yield, and eight high strength selections from each cross.

The linear correlation coefficient for the F2 and mean F3, yield was .48 and not significant. The F2 hybrids, therefore, gave little information regarding which cross to use when selecting for lint yield. However, high correlations between the F2 and F3 for lint percent, seed index, and fiber length, strength, and elongation were detected. The performance of F2 was a good indication of these traits.

Differences in yield, lint percent, seed index, fiber length, and fiber strength among the three selection types were observed. The yield selections produced 5.7% more lint than the random and strength selections. However, the increased yield was partially at the expense of fiber properties. The average length and strength of the fiber quality selections were slightly greater (1.0%) than the random entries. There was no significant difference in yield between the random and high strength selections.

Key Words: Variety improvement • Correlated response • Yield • Agronomic traits • Fiber properties


1 Contribution from the Cotton Physiology Research Laboratory, ARS, USDA, and the Delta Branch of the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Stoneville, Miss. Published as Journal Paper 2407 of the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station.

2 Research Geneticist, ARS, USDA; and Plant Breeder, Delta Branch of the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Stoneville, Miss. 38776.

Received for publication September 5, 1972.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
B. T. Campbell, D. T. Bowman, and D. B. Weaver
Heterotic Effects in Topcrosses of Modern and Obsolete Cotton Cultivars
Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 593 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. G. Jones and C. W. Smith
Early Generation Testing in Upland Cotton
Crop Sci., December 2, 2005; 46(1): 1 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1973 by the Crop Science Society of America.