Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 12:780-783 (1972)
© 1972 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miskin, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miskin, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, D. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miskin, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, D. N.

Inheritance and Physiological Effects of Stomatal Frequency in Barley

Koy E. Miskin, Donald C. Rasmusson and Dale N. Moss2

We studied inheritance of Stomatal frequency in five barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), populations and the effect of Stomatal frequency on photosynthesis, transpiration, and Stomatal resistance to diffusion. The latter studies were done using barley lines high and low in Stomatal frequency from two backcross populations.

Heritabilities, estimated by the parent-progeny regression method, ranged from 22 to 74%. These estimates were for the F2 and F3 generations on the individual plant basis. Realized hei it abilities based on simulated high and low selection were in good agreement with the regression estimates, although the estimates were consistently higher for the high than for the low selection.

For plants pretreated to assure open stomata, Stomatal diffusive resistances and transpiration rates differed statistically among lines, but photosynthesis did not. Lines having low Stomatal frequencies had higher Stomatal resistances, and transpired less water than lines with more stomata. A 25% decrease in frequency of stomata reduced transpiration rates by about 24%. Stomatal frequency did not influence the rate of photosynthesis, however. Hence, the possibility exists of altering transpiration without altering photosynthesis by selecting varieties with fewer stomata.

Key Words: Transpiration • Photosynthesis • Drouth tolerance


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn. Paper No. 7895, Scientific Journal Series

2 Former graduate student, now Manager, Winter Wheat Research, Funk Bros. Seed Co., Bloomington, 111. 61701, and Professors, Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn. 55101.

Received for publication March 9, 1972.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
U. Schluter, M. Muschak, D. Berger, and T. Altmann
Photosynthetic performance of an Arabidopsis mutant with elevated stomatal density (sdd1-1) under different light regimes
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2003; 54(383): 867 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1972 by the Crop Science Society of America.