Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 12:612-615 (1972)
© 1972 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinkas, L. L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pinkas, L. L. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pinkas, L. L. H.

Influence of Light and Temperature Environments Preceding and During the Dark Period on Floral Initiation in Pima Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.)1

Leonard L. H. Pinkas2

Floral induction in American Pima cotton, (Gossypium barbadense L.), cultivars ‘Pima S-3’ and ‘Pima S-4’, occurred earlier (at lower node levels on the main stem) under short winter days than under long summer days when plants were grown under natural light and a controlled temperature program.

The intensities of red and far red light in natural sunlight were measured to determine if there were daily or seasonal changes in spectral quality that might be related to variations in floral initiation. Red light predominated during the day, but the balance shifted to a predominance of far red light between sunset and darkness. This relationship was not seasonal.

Total exclusion of all light from plants during the 1.5-hour period before sunset accelerated floral induction if the temperature during this period was above 30 C, but either had no effect or retarded induction if the temperature was below 30 C. Shortening or interrupting the natural dark period with low intensity lights of different spectral composition retarded induction. The intensity of blue light, but not red or far red light, appeared to be related to induction. The increase in the node number of the first fruiting branch was almost directly proportional to the time interval between sunset and the interruption of the dark period.

Floral induction was most sensitive to photoperiod and to high temperatures during sunset during the 2nd week of development after germination.

Key Words: Photoperiod • Flowering • Spectral quality • Red light • Far red light • Blue light


1 Cooperative investigations of Plant Science Research Division, ARS, USDA, and the University of Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station. Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Paper Number 1884. The capable technical assistance of Mr. Donald Brummett is acknowledged.

2 Plant Physiologist, U. S. Western Cotton Research Laboratory, 4135 E. Broadway Road, Phoenix, Ariz. 85040.

Received for publication March 1, 1972.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1972 by the Crop Science Society of America.