Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 12:553-557 (1972)
© 1972 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKee, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Langille, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McKee, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Langille, A. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McKee, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Langille, A. R.

Flowering of Crownvetch as Affected by Thermo-Inductive Treatment, Photoperiod, Plant Age, and Genotype1

G. W. McKee, M. L. Risius2 and A. R. Langille3

Since crownvetch (Coronilla varia L.) does not flower under conditions conducive to flowering in alfalfa, (Medicago sativa L.), red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), and birdfoot trefoil, (Lotus corniculatus L.), four hypotheses were developed concerning flowering in this species. These included: (i) crownvetch requires exposure to cool or cold conditions (thermo-induction) before flowering can occur; (ii) Thermo-induction can occur under either long or short photoperiods, but long photoperiods are subsequently required for the initiation and development of floral primordia; (iii) A certain plant age is required before thermo-induction can occur; and (iv) Crownvetch genotypes and cultivars differ in their need for thermoinduction. A series of field, greenhouse, and growth chamber studies indicated that all or nearly all 4- to 8-week-old plants of ‘Penngift’ crownvetch exposed to effective thermo-inductive treatment (minimum temperatures of 10 or less for 12 to 15 hr per day) subsequently flowered in 5 to 7 weeks when tested under warm conditions (20 C or above) and long photoperiods (16 hr or longer). Plants weeks old when subjected to thermo-inductive treatment required longer exposure (8 weeks) than 8-week-old plants, which required only 4 weeks of thermo-inductive treatment. In these studies thermo-induction occurred under both long (16- to 24-hr) and short (9- to 12-hr) photoperiods, but thermo-induced plants flowered only when subsequently exposed to photoperiods of 15 hr or more. Nearly all 5- to 8-week-old plants of the cultivar Penngift could be thermo-induced in 4 weeks. Plants of ‘Chemung’ and ‘Emerald’ cultivars needed to be both older (8 to 16 weeks) and thermo-induced at 10 C or below for longer periods (8 weeks or more) for a comparable response. addition, some genotypes within different cultivars differed somewhat in their response to thermo-inductive treatment. By using the above techniques, we were able to cause most plants of Penngift crownvetch to flower 13 to 16 weeks after seeding; plants of Emerald and Chemung, however, generally require 7 to 8 weeks longer.

Key Words: Coronilla varia L. • Thermo-induction • Photo-induction • Penngift • Emerald • Chemung


1 Approved for publication as paper number 3923 in the journal series of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Professor and Associate Professor, respectively, Department of Agronomy, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa. 16802.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Maine, Orono, Me. 04473.

Received for publication March 10, 1971.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1972 by the Crop Science Society of America.