Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 12:487-490 (1972)
© 1972 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Levy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, M. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Levy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, M. L.

Responses of Spring Wheats to Vernalization and Photoperiod1

Jose Levy and Maurice L. Peterson2

Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) cultivars from various sources and different maturity classes were analyzed for responses to vernalization and photoperiod. Response measurements were days to heading, number of leaves on the main culm, and number of tillers at time of heading. Seven of 13 spring cultivars responded to vernalization as measured by reduced leaf number at heading, although differences were small. All 13 spring cultivars, plus a semi-winter and a winter cultivar, headed sooner if vernalized, although the reductions (2 or 3 days) in some of them can probably attributed to slow development during vernalization. Tiller number at heading was reduced in cultivars responding to vernalization. Response to vernalization of spring types appeared unrelated to earliness of maturity under field conditions. All cultivars tested headed earlier with increasing photoperiods in a series of treatments from 9 to 17 hours. Early maturing cultivars responded least to lengthened photoperiods, and late-maturing cultivars responded most. A highly significant interaction was obtained between the vernalization and photoperiod responses in one cultivar showing small responses to these individual treatments. However, photoperiod alone rather than vernalization appeared to be the primary factor controlling maturity in spring wheats.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Heading • Tillering • Leaf number • Maturity


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, Calif. Includes a portion of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the M.Sc. degree.

2 Formerly graduate student, now Agricultural Consultant, Box 6206, Cali, Colombia, S.A. and Professor of Agronomy, University of California, Davis, Calif. 95616.

Received for publication January 17, 1972.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Iqbal, A. Navabi, R.-C. Yang, D. F. Salmon, and D. Spaner
The Effect of Vernalization Genes on Earliness and Related Agronomic Traits of Spring Wheat in Northern Growing Regions
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1031 - 1039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. M. Baloch, R. S. Karow, E. Marx, J. G. Kling, and M. D. Witt
Vernalization Studies with Pacific Northwest Wheat
Agron. J., September 1, 2003; 95(5): 1201 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. Mahfoozi, A. E. Limin, and D. B. Fowler
Influence of Vernalization and Photoperiod Responses on Cold Hardiness in Winter Cereals
Crop Sci., July 1, 2001; 41(4): 1006 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1972 by the Crop Science Society of America.