Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 12:245-247 (1972)
© 1972 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Widstrom, N. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Widstrom, N. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Widstrom, N. W.

Reciprocal Differences and Combining Ability for Corn Earworm Injury among Maize Single Crosses1

N. W. Widstrom2

Reciprocal differences and combining abilities for corn earworm [Heliothis zea (Boddie)] injury were determined for single crosses among ten southern adapted maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds. Specific combining ability effects approached general combining ability effects in terms of their relative importance in conditioning resistance to injury by the corn earworm. Highly significant genotype-environment interactions occurred for both general and specific combining abilities. Reciprocal effects were highly significant during one of 2 years but nearly disappeared in the combined analysis by way of a genotype-environment interaction.

Constant parent regression (c.p.r.) analysis revealed significant amount of dominance for earworm injury, nearing the complete dominance level. The size of negative c.p.r., values for some inbreds suggested the presence of overdominance for resistance to earworm injury. In general, nonadditive effects appear to be nearly as important as additive effects in producing plant resistance. Reciprocal effects may interfere with identification of resistant genotypes through their interaction with specific enviromnents, but may normally be ignored as important genetic determinants. Consideration of the reciprocal differences and combining abilities obtained for these inbreds and crosses as selection criteria are discussed.

Key Words: Zea mays (L.) • Host plant resistance • Heliothis zea (Boddie) • Dominance • Gene action


1 Contribution of the Plant Science Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, in cooperation with University of Georgia College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton, Ga. 31794.

2 Research Geneticist, Plant Science Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Tifton, Ga. 31794.

Received for publication October 8, 1971.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1972 by the Crop Science Society of America.