Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 12:93-94 (1972)
© 1972 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minton, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minton, E. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minton, E. B.

Effects of Seed Treatment with Fungicides and Systemic Insecticides on Stand of Cotton1

E. B. Minton2

In 1967 the insecticide, 0,0,diethyl-S-2- [(ethylthio) ethyl] phosphorodithioate (disulfoton), did not affect cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedling stands when used with the fungicide combinations of tetrachloroisophthalonitrite (chlorothalonil) + p-dimethylaminobenzenediazo sodium sulfonate (Dexon3) + 1,4-dichloro-2,5- dimethoxybenzene (chloroneb). However, it caused slight reduction of the stand when used with chlorothalonil + N-(trichloromethylthio)-4-cyclohexene-l,2-dicarboximide (captan), as compared to seed treated only with fungicides. In another test, stands from acid-delinted seeds were not affected differentially by combination seed treatments of pentachloronitrobenzene + 3-trichloromethyl-5-ethoxy-l,2,4-thiadiazole (formulated as Terracoat L213) and any of the systemic insecticides tested. However, stands from machine-delinted seeds were lower consistently with the combined fungicide-insecticide treatments, as compared to the fungicide treatment alone. In 1968 stands were increased by seed treatment with Terracoat L21 + disulfoton, or by the multiple-fungicide treatment of Terracoat L21 + methyl mercury-2,3-dihydroxy propyl mercaptide and methyl mercury acetate (Ceresan L3), as compared to seeds treated with only Terracoat L21. When an emulsifiable formulation of Terracoat L21, as compared to the oil-base seed treatment formulation, was used for seed treatment purposes, stands from the combination treatments were reduced.

Key Words: Gossypium hirsulum L. • Chemical interactions


1 Cooperative investigation of the Plant Science Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture and Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University.

2 Research Plant Pathologist, Plant Science Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture in cooperation with Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Lubbock, Texas.

Received for publication August 4, 1971.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1972 by the Crop Science Society of America.