Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 12:80-81 (1972)
© 1972 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Normann, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Normann, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Normann, R. M.

Use of the Modified Pelshenke Test for Early Generation Wheat Quality Screening1

J. R. Welsh and R. M. Normann2

The modified Pelshenke wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) meal fermentation time test was evaluated as an early generation predictor of bread flour properties. Experiments were conducted comparing Pelshenke values, protein values, and mixograph properties. Comparisons were made between all three tests on 233 lines in 3 years, and on 140 paired observations between Pelshenke values on F2 plants and protein and mixograph values on subsequent F3 plant rows. Protein values did not correlate with any other measurements.

On the 233 lines on which all tests were conducted, the Pelshenke test was in complete agreement with mixograph measurements 75% of the time with respect to saving or discarding samples. Thirteen percent of the lines would have been saved by the Pelshenke test and discarded on mixograph, and 12% would have been discarded by the Pelshenke test and saved on the mixograph.

In the 140 paired observations between F2 Pelshenke values and F3 mixograph values, accurate predictions occurred in 72% of the cases. Seventeen percent of the cases would have been saved by the Pelshenke test and later discarded by the mixograph, while 11% would have been discarded by the Pelshenke but saved by the mixograph.

The Pelshenke test can be used with good reliability to screen for later performance on the mixograph.

Key Words: Modified Pelshenke test • Mixograph • Milling and baking • Protein


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80521. Published with the approval of the Director of the Colorado State University Experiment Station as Scientific Series paper No. 1655.

2 Associate Professor of Agronomy (Crops) and Principal Research Technician, Colorado State University, respectively.

Received for publication June 19, 1971.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1972 by the Crop Science Society of America.