Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 11:658-661 (1971)
© 1971 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carangal, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sentz, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carangal, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sentz, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carangal, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sentz, J. C.

Comparison of S1 with Testcross Evaluation for Recurrent Selection in Maize1

V. R. Carangal, S. M. Ali, A. F. Koble, E. H. Rinke and J. C. Sentz2

We made S1 and testcross progeny evaluations for two cycles of recurrent selection for grain yield in a 13-line maize (Zea mays L.) synthetic. In the first cycle we evaluated 60 lines at four locations in 1 year. For the second cycle we evaluated 68 lines in three trials during 2 years. Selection intensity was 17% in both cycles.

Genetic variance for grain yield in the first cycle was significantly greater for selfed progeny in comparison with testcross evaluation, but decreased in the second cycle. Variability for ear moisture, broken stalks, and root lodging was increased with both selection procedures. S1 selection for grain yield gave greater improvement in the population per se, and was equal to testcross selection for general combining ability improvement. However, one second-cycle testcross progeny exceeded the highest-yielding parental line testcross.

Genotypic correlations were greater between related and nonrelated testcrosses than between S1 and either testcross. However, several selections were common to both S1 and testcross procedures. Second-cycle correlations were significantly lower than first-cycle values.

Key Words: Zea mays L. • Synthetic variety • Genotypic variance • Heritability • Combining ability • Inbreeding depression


1 Paper no. 7534, Scientific Journal Series, Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn. 55101.

2 Assistant Professor, Division of Plant Breeding, University of the Philippines, Los Banos; Maize Breeder, Research Station, Amberpet Hyderabad, A.P., India; Manager, Northern Corn Research, Cargill Inc., St. Peter, Minn.; Research Coordinator, Northrup King and Company, Minneapolis, Minn.; and Associate Professor in Agronomy & Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minn., respectively.

Received for publication February 18, 1971.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1971 by the Crop Science Society of America.