Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 11:635-638 (1971)
© 1971 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. G.

Sunflower Phenology—Year, Variety, and Date of Planting Effects on Day and Growing Degree-day Summations1

R. G. Robinson2

Six sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) varieties were planted at seven dates ranging from April 24 to June 28, 1967 through 1969. Day and growing degree-day (GDD) summations were calculated for consecutive growth periods.

Varietal differences in relative maturity were apparent at head-visible stage. Differences among varieties in length of growth periods after first-anther stage were small. Day summations in the prebloom periods declined from early to late planting in contrast with relatively small and random variation in GDD summations. The decrease in day summations from early to late planting in the emergence to head-visible and emergence to first-anther periods was not attributed to photoperiod but to increase in GDD per day.

GDD summation to either head-visible or first-anther stage was an effective rating of varietal maturity and did not vary greatly under differing environments. Both day and GDD summations declined from early to late planting in both last anther to maturity and planting to maturity periods. Both day and GDD summations varied among years for all growth periods, but the magnitude of variation in some periods was not great.

Key Words: Crop climatology


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55101. Paper No. 7532 of the Scientific Journal Series, Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 Associate Professor, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.

Received for publication February 13, 1971.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. M. Johnston, D. L. Tanaka, P. R. Miller, S. A. Brandt, D. C. Nielsen, G. P. Lafond, and N. R. Riveland
Oilseed Crops for Semiarid Cropping Systems in the Northern Great Plains
Agron. J., March 1, 2002; 94(2): 231 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1971 by the Crop Science Society of America.