Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 11:559-561 (1971)
© 1971 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kilen, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hartwig, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kilen, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hartwig, E. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kilen, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hartwig, E. E.

Inheritance of a Light-Quality Sensitive Character in Soybeans1

T. C. Kilen and E. E. Hartwig2

Flowering of the soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars ‘Lee’ and ‘Hill’ (insensitive to light quality) was delayed when grown in light from cool-white fluorescent lamps at a 15-hr photoperiod, or in natural daylight with the photoperiod extended to 15 hr by illumination with fluorescent lamps. ‘Arksoy’ and ‘Dorman’ (sensitive to light quality) flowered 28 to 30 days after emergence when grown under the same conditions. Flowering of all four cultivars was delayed when light from incandescent lamps supplemented that from the fluorescent lamps.

Progeny from the crosses Dorman x Hill and Arksoy x Lee segregated in the F2 generation at approximately 3 delayed:1 early when grown under fluorescent lamps alone, indicating that the light-quality sensitive character acts as a monogenic recessive under these conditions. However, when F2 populations of the same two crosses were grown in short days of natural light extended with fluorescent lamps, the heterozygote was distinguished and a 1:2:1 ratio was obtained. F1 plants from crosses between light-quality sensitive and insensitive types had flowering dates intermediate to the parents when grown in natural light extended with fluorescent lamps, but showed a response similar to that of the insensitive parent when grown in light from fluorescent lamps alone. Reciprocal backcross data gave additional support for one locus with two alleles for the light-quality sensitive character. Bulk populations of Arksoy x Lee and Dorman x Hill that had been advanced in the field were grown under fluorescent lamps. The results obtained suggest that the light-quality sensitive genotype is a poor competitor in a mixed population.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr • Photoperiod • Day Length


1 Cooperative investigations of the Plant Science Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, and the Delta Branch of the Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station, Stoneville, Miss.

2 Geneticist and Research Agronomist, Plant Science Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Miss. 38776.

Received for publication January 29, 1971.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1971 by the Crop Science Society of America.