Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 11:180-184 (1971)
© 1971 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hooker, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hooker, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hooker, A. L.

Gene Action Conditioning Resistance to Northern Leaf Blight in Maize1

G. R. Hughes and A. L. Hooker2

The nature of gene action conditioning the quantitative type of resistance in maize (Zea mays L.) to Northern leaf blight caused by Helminthosporium turcicum Pass. was studied in crosses between four Australian resistant inbred lines (D21, HB, 21H, and 25) and three tester inbred lines (susceptibles H10 and 701, and moderately resistant Oh43). Populations composed of the P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1P1 and BC1P2 generations were studied for the 12 possible crosses in 1966 and with the addition of F3, BC1P1S and BC1P2S families for four crosses in 1967.

Additive, dominance, and epistatic gene action were detected by analysis of generation means. Additive gene action was of major importance in all crosses in both years. The relative importance of non-additive effects was generally small and varied with the population involved and, to a lesser extent, with the year of study. Although biased by limitations in experimental and analytical design, estimates of components of genetic variance were in general agreement with the results of the generation mean analysis.

It was concluded that leaf blight resistance in these lines was conditioned by a relatively low number of genes, primarily additive in effect. Breeding for resistance to this disease should be effectively accomplished by such simple procedures as phenotypic recurrent selection or mass selection.

Key Words: Zea maysHelminthosporium turcicum • Quantitative host resistance • Generation mean analysis


1 Contribution from the Department of Plant Pathology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill. 61801. Seed of the inbred lines used in this study was provided by the Department of Agriculture, New South Wales, Australia.

2 Formerly Research Assistant (now Assistant Professor of Crop Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon) and Professor of Plant Pathology and Genetics, University of Illinois, Urbana. This study was conducted while the senior author held a Thomas Lawrence Pawlett Traveling Scholarship from the University of Sydney, Australia.

Received for publication May 6, 1970.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1971 by the Crop Science Society of America.