Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 11:73-75 (1971)
© 1971 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, C. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, C. H.

Development of Two Alfalfa Populations with Resistance to Insect Pests, Nematodes, and Diseases. I. Aphid Resistance1

O. J. Hunt2, R. N. Peaden2, M. W. Nielson3 and C. H. Hanson4

‘Turkistan’ alfalfa (Medicago saliva L.) is a good source of resistance to aphids, to organisms such as stem nematode associated with moist soil conditions, and diseases such as bacterial wilt and Phytophthora root rot. It is very susceptible to foliar pathogens.

In 1959, two germplasm pools, MSE and MSF, were initiated at Beltsville, Md., by intercrossing 50 plants of Turkistan origin with 50 foliar disease-resistant plants of MSA-9, MSB-9, and ‘DuPuits’ alfalfa. After four cycles of intercrossing and recombination within pools, the two pools were sent to Reno, Nev., and later to Tucson, Ariz., to undergo two cycles of penotypic selection for resistance to spotted alfalfa aphid [Therioaphis maculata (Buckton)] and pea aphid, [Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)]. From 65 to 300 plants were intercrossed within each cycle and pool to initiate a new cycle.

Cycles 4, 5, and 6 were evaluated for seedling survival under severe aphid infestations. An average of 95 and 92% of the plants of MSE-6 and MSF-6, respectively, survived the spotted alfalfa aphid test, compared to 1% for ‘Caliverde’. An average of 60 and 42% of the plants of MSE-6 and MSF-6, respectively, survived the pea aphid test, compared to 0% for Caliverde. This form of mass selection was effective in developing resistance to spotted alfalfa aphids and pea aphids.

Key Words: Pea aphid • Spotted alfalfa aphid • Recurrent selection • Germplasm pools


1 Cooperative investigations of the Crops and Entomology Research Divisions, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Nevada Agricultural Experiment Station, Reno, Nev. 89507. Paper No. 143 of the Journal Series.

2 Research Agronomists, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Reno, Nevada.

3 Research Entomologist, Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bee Research Laboratory, Tucson, Arizona 85719.

4 Research Agronomist, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Plant Industry Station, Beltsville, Maryland 20705.

Received for publication July 17, 1970.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1971 by the Crop Science Society of America.