Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 11:51-54 (1971)
© 1971 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Empig, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fehr, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Empig, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fehr, W. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Empig, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fehr, W. R.

Evaluation of Methods for Generation Advance in Bulk Hybrid Soybean Populations1

L. T. Empig and W. R. Fehr2

We evaluated four methods of generation advance in bulk hybrid soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) populations for their ability to maintain superior genotypes and genetic variability for economic traits and for their efficiency in sampling time. The methods used were single seed descent (SSD), restricted cross-bulk (RCB), maturity-group bulk (MGB), and cross-bulk (CB).

Method means did not differ significantly at either location, and differences in genotypic variance among methods were not consistent in all crosses. SSD, RCB, and MGB maintained a similar number of high yielding lines, about twice as many as CB. SSD and MGB were the most effective methods in maintaining early lines. However, there were no differences among methods for the frequency of late segregates. SSD was about twice as effective for maintaining large-seeded lines as the other methods. The four methods did not differ appreciably for the number of lodging resistant lines. RCB had the highest frequency of tall plants.

Comparison of the harvest time spent in obtaining samples for the next generation showed that CB was the fastest and RCB the second fastest method. SSD was more time-consuming than CB and RCB. MGB was the most time-consuming, since it required pulling plants at several different times to maintain subpopulations restricted in maturity.

SSD was the method least influenced by natural selection; therefore, it may be the most useful method in greenhouse or winter nursery environments where a genotype may perform differently than under field conditions in its area of adaptation.

Key Words: Single seed descent • Bulk breeding • Glycine max (L.) Merrill


1 Joint contribution from the Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, as No. 626 of the U.S. Regional Soybean Laboratory, and the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa, 50010, as Journal Paper No. J-6512, Project No. 1179. Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree.

2 Research Associate, Iowa State University (Present address: Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska), and Associate Professor of Agronomy and Collaborator, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, Iowa State University.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1971 by the Crop Science Society of America.