Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 10:9-13 (1970)
© 1970 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buttery, B.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buttery, B.R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Buttery, B.R.

Effects of Variation in Leaf Area Index on Growth of Maize and Soybeans1

B.R. Buttery2

Maize and soybean crops were grown at high density in separate plots in the same field experiment; when a thick canopy had developed, a range of leaf area indexes (LAI) was created by thinning. Samples were taken at time of thinning and 2 weeks later. The experiment was repeated twice yearly for 3 years.

Mean relative growth rate (RGR) and mean net assimilation rate (NAR) increased with increasing density, while mean crop growth rate (CGR) and leaf area ratio (LAR) decreased. In four maize and two soybean experiments the best fitting regression of NAR on LAI was a straight line; in the other six experiments the relationship was curvilinear. NAR of maize declined more rapidly with increase in LAI than did that of soybeans, but if the regression values at LAI = 4 were expressed as percentages of the values at LAI = 1, the NAR of maize and soybeans decreased at the same rate. Thus, the adverse effects of self-shading with increase in LAI are at least as pronounced in maize as in soybeans. Despite this, NAR of soybeans was only 57% of that of maize, and CGR of maize was correspondingly greater than that of soybeans. In only 4 out of the 12 experiments was an optimum value of LAI indicated.

Key Words: Growth analysis • Photosynthesis • Plant population • Thinning • Glycine maxZea mays


1 Contribution from Canada Department of Agriculture, Research Station, Harrow, Ontario. The technical assistance of Mr. R. Walker and Mr. J. Tofflemire is gratefully acknowledged.

2 Research scientist in Plant Physiology.

Received for publication February 3, 1969.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1970 by the Crop Science Society of America.