Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 10:39-41 (1970)
© 1970 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garwood, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Garwood, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, D. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Garwood, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, D. E.

Effect of Different Cytoplasms on Oil, Fatty Acids, Plant Height, and Ear Height in Maize (Zea mays L.)1

D. L. Garwood, Evelyn J. Weber, R. J. Lambert and D. E. Alexander2

Plant-to-plant reciprocal crosses were made between the maize (Zea mays L.) strain Illinois High Oil (IHO) and each of seven maize inbreds plus the strain Illinois Low Oil (ILO). Oil analysis showed that the direction of the cross caused the oil content of F1 kernels to vary an average of 3.00%. Paternal effects were of similar magnitude. These effects relate to differences in proportion of germ, percent oil in the germ, and fatty acid distribution in the whole kernel. To separate the physiological influence of the female parent from that of the cytoplasm it contributes, we examined F1 plants and, in a 2-year study, F2 kernels differing only in their cytoplasm source. Oil content, ear height, and plant height were affected in some IHO x lme reciprocal hybrids, but there was no effect on fatty acid composition. Because the largest cytoplasmic effect on oil was 0.14%, we concluded that the physiological influence of the female parent was responsible for the 3.00% maternal effect.

Key Words: Maternal effect • Paternal effect


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, and Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Urbana, Illinois 61801. Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the M.S. degree. Mention of a trademark name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.

2 Fellow in Agronomy (now Research Assistant, Department of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa. 16802); Research Chemist, Cereal Crops Research Branch, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA; Assistant Professor of Plant Genetics, and Professor of Plant Genetics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1970 by the Crop Science Society of America.